Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of Preventive Methods Applied to the Occlusal Surface of Primary Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Study
Fracasso, Marina de Lourdes Calvo; Venante, Helena Sandrini; Santin, Gabriela Cristina; Salles, Carlos Luiz Fernandes; Provenzano, Maria Gisette Arias; Maciel, Sandra Mara.
Affiliation
  • Fracasso, Marina de Lourdes Calvo; State University of Maringá. Maringá. BR
  • Venante, Helena Sandrini; s.af
  • Santin, Gabriela Cristina; State University of Maringá. Maringá. BR
  • Salles, Carlos Luiz Fernandes; State University of Maringá. Maringá. BR
  • Provenzano, Maria Gisette Arias; State University of Maringá. Maringá. BR
  • Maciel, Sandra Mara; State University of Maringá. Maringá. BR
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 18(1): 3675, 15/01/2018. tab
Article in En | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-965609
Responsible library: BR1822.9
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical performance of three preventive materials on the occlusal surfaces of primary molars over a 36-month period. Material and

Methods:

The study was conducted with a split-mouth design involving four experimental groups G1 ­ resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer®); G2 - resin sealant (Alpha Seal Light®); G3 - silver diamine fluoride (Cariostatic®); and G4 - control group without material. Thirty-two children aged 36 to 60 months, attending a pediatric clinic, with a deft index ≥ 1 and four primary second molars participated in the study. The material retention was evaluated in G1 and G2, and the presence of incipient caries was evaluated in all groups. Data were submitted to the Wilcoxon test and survival test (α = 5%).

Results:

At three, six, 12, 24 and 36 months, G2 exhibited greater material loss (maximum loss 44%) in comparison to G1 (maximum loss 35%), but this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.214). The highest incidence of incipient caries occurred in G3 (20%), but no significant differences were found between groups at any evaluation time (p = 0.154).

Conclusion:

There were no statistically significant differences between the evaluated products regarding material retention and dental caries, although there was more material loss in teeth that received the Alpha Seal® sealant resin, and a greater number of carious lesions in the Cariostatic® group (silver diamine fluoride).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: BBO / LILACS Main subject: Pit and Fissure Sealants / Tooth, Deciduous / Dental Caries / Glass Ionomer Cements / Molar Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Child, preschool Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: BBO / LILACS Main subject: Pit and Fissure Sealants / Tooth, Deciduous / Dental Caries / Glass Ionomer Cements / Molar Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Child, preschool Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: